Number №2, 2025 - page 34-44

Social media as a communication tool between physician and patient: analysis of risks, clinical outcomes, and regulatory barriers DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2025-11-2-34-44

For citation: Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A. Social media as a communication tool between physician and patient: analysis of risks, clinical outcomes, and regulatory barriers. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2025;11(2):34-44; https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2025-11-2-34-44
Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A.
  • Shaderkin I.A. – PhD, Head of the Digital Department of the Center for Digital Medicine of the Institute of Digital Biodesign and Modeling of Living Systems of the Scientific and Technological Park of Biomedicine of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Leading Researcher of the Department of Scientific Foundations of Healthcare Organization of the FSBI «Central Research Institute for Organization and Informatization of Health Care» Ministry of Health of Russia; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 695560, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-2674
  • Shaderkina V.A. – Scientific editor of the urological information portal UroWeb.ru; RSCI Author ID 880571, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-4129
7

Introduction. Social media (SM) presents a «paradox» for healthcare: while a powerful tool for improving clinical outcomes, it carries critical risks when used unregulated.

This study aims to provide healthcare organizers and physicians with an evidence-based analysis of this problem.

Results. The research confirms that the nature of a physician's SM behavior directly impacts patient adherence: professional content increases it, while personal content decreases it. The ethical standards of «e-professionalism» and international guidelines (AMA, GMC) are analyzed, revealing a significant gap in physician training. Special attention is given to legal barriers. In Russia, the use of public messengers (WhatsApp, Telegram) for patient communication directly contradicts the requirements of FL-242 (Telemedicine), which mandates state identification/e-signature (ESIA/UKEP) , and FL-152 (Personal Data), due to transborder data transfer risks.

Сonclusions. As a solution, the implementation of a «strategic triad» in clinics is proposed: Developing internal Policies; Migrating to secure technology platforms; Mandatory staff training.

AttachmentSize
Download461.79 KB
social media; doctor-patient communication; digital professionalism; patient adherence; compliance; telemedicine; personal data; HIPAA; medical confidentiality; medical ethics; WhatsApp; Telegram; messengers in medicin

Я хочу получать электронную версию журнала